Quantum Population Dynamics: A Broad View from an Exploration beyond the Standard Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To explore quantum and classical connection from a new perspective, a Quantum Population Dynamics (QPoD) model based on the logistic relation common to several sciences is investigated from a very broad perspective to explore the numerous links to current physics. From postulates of causality and finiteness a classical quantum entity, a quanta of spacetime, is defined with unitary extension and intensity. Applying the logistic equation to a quantum population of non-local two-state oscillators results in a quantum-classical equation linking wave and particle dynamics with an explicit account of decoherence. Varying over 124 orders of magnitude, the coupling constant acts like a delta Dirac function between regimes. The quantum regime is conform to Schrödinger and Dirac equations according to respective Hamiltonian while the classical mode suppresses the quantum wave function and follows the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Besides the quantum wave solutions, in the classical range, the general equation admits Fermi-Dirac and Bose-Einstein solutions, relating to thermodynamics. Inertial mass is found in terms of the quantum entropy gradient. The most compact quantum cluster forming a crystal produces a unique flat space filling lattice cells of one simple tetrahedron and one composite truncated tetrahedron corresponding respectively to a fermionic cell and a bosonic cell. From this lattice geometry alone, the mass ratios of all fermions are expressed uniquely in terms of vertices and faces, matching charges properties of three generations and three families. Except for a minor degeneracy correction, the solution is shown to follow the logistic dynamics. The resulting mass equation is a function of dimensionless natural numbers. Many properties of the Standard Model are recovered from geometry at the Planck scale, respecting naturalness, uniqueness and minimality. QPoD may help addressing questions about the nature of spacetime and the physical microstructure of particles. The model predicts a single spinless matter particle of a 4th generation as a WIMP particle close to Higgs mass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".