Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Revistes ressenyades: Comunicación y Sociedad, Nueva época, Núm. 11 (julio-diciembre de 2008). Communicare: Revista de Pesquisa, vol. 8, Núm. 2, (segundo semestre de 2008). Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação, vol. 32, Núm. 1 (2009). Revista Mexicana de Comunicación, año 10, Núm. 116 (mayo de 2009). Sala de Prensa: Web para Profesionales de la Comunicación Iberoamericanos, año 11, vol. 5, Núm. 116 (junio de 2009). Zócalo: Comunicación, Política y Sociedad, año 9, Núm. 112 (junio de 2009). Comunicaçao e Sociedade, vol. 13 (2008).Communication et Langages: Signes, Objets et Pratiques,núm. 158 (diciembre de 2008). Media, Culture & Society,vol. 31, Núm. 3 (mayo de 2009).New Media & Society,vol. 11, No. 4 (junio de 2009).Canadian Journal of Communication, vol. 33, No. 4 (2008).The Communication Review, vol. 12, Núm. 2 (2009). Health Communication, vol. 24, Núm. 1 (2009). Human Communication Research, vol. 35, Núm. 2 (abril de 2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it