MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7070984681

The prebiotic effect of enzymatically-released bioactive components of canola meal fibre on gut health and growth performance of monogastric animals

2023· dissertation· en· W7070984681 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaCanola Council of Canada
KeywordsPrebioticMonogastricXylanaseLactobacillus acidophilusBroilerCanolaProbioticIleumPolysaccharideDigestion (alchemy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canola meal (CM) contains a significant amount of non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) which with the use of enzyme technology could be hydrolyzed to low-molecular-weight polysaccharides and oligosaccharides. We hypothesized that enzymatically-released bioactive components of CM fibre would have a prebiotic effect on gastrointestinal microbiota of monogastric animals. A variety of carbohydrases were evaluated in the series of in vitro studies, and the most effective enzyme combination was used in the study. The blend of a multi-carbohydrase preparation containing pectinase and xylanase activities showed the ability to hydrolyze 47.9% of CM NSP in vitro and improved NSP digestibility of broilers fed diets containing CM. The enzyme blend was used to produce enzymatically-modified CM (ECM, lab scale) and ECM solubles (ECMS, pilot scale), and their prebiotic properties were evaluated. The results of the broiler chicken study showed that replacing CM with ECM significantly improved the overall apparent total tract digestibility of NSP. Lactobacillus spp. was present in much larger counts (P < 0.01) in ileal and cecal digesta of birds fed the ECM diets when compared to the Control treatment. The AMEn value of ECM was 31% higher than that of CM. There was no difference in the standardized ileal amino acid digestibility of CM and ECM. Supplementation diets with ECMS improved growth performance, increased total SCFA in ileal digesta, and provided favorable conditions for the proliferation of Lactobacillus spp. and Enterococcus spp. in ileum and ceca of broilers. The effect of ECM and ECMS supplementation on growth performance and gut health of weaned piglets was investigated. No effect of ECM was observed; however, ECMS positively affected the intestinal pH and proliferation of beneficial gut microbiota. In conclusion, modification of CM fibre with carbohydrases significantly changed its structure and enhanced its bioactivity. Processing of CM developed throughout this project generated novel products, ECM and ECMS, which when fed to broilers and pigs, demonstrated their ability to enhance the diversity of the gut microbiota population and improve nutrient utilization. Therefore, the enzymatic modification of CM can create value-added feed additives, which can improve animal health and support antibiotic-free feeding programs in monogastric animals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→