Report : Petition of J. Scranton and J. Hunt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It appears from the papers in the case, that the steamship "Southerner," having on board the United States mail, sundry passengers, and $6,500 in money belonging to the pay department of the army, left the harbor of San Francisco, California, on the 20th December, 1854, for Fort Vancouver, Washington Territory.When two days out the "Southerner" met a severe gale, by which she was disabled, and notwithstanding the most vigorous efforts to make a harbor, she was finally wrecked, on the 27th of the same month, being driven upon the beach near the entrance to Puget's Sound.The passengers, (including women and children,) with such of the freight as could be saved from the wreck, were landed upon the beach, nearly 150 miles from any white settlement, from which they were separated by nearly impassable mountains, covered with snow.In this situation, surrounded by Indians of doubtful friendship, with provisions for only eleven days, on half rations, in the midst of winter and with no means of escape but a single small boat, (for fifty persons,) it was determined that Captain Sampson, master of the Southerner, with six men, should proceed to Fort Townsend, 150 miles distant, in search of relief.After an incessant toil of four days and nights, they reached the fort; and applied to Captain Pease, in command of the revenue cutt~r "Jeff.Davis," for relief.Captain Pease being unable to get to sea, in consequence of head winds, entered into an agreement, subject to the approval of the department, with the petitioners, owner and master of the steamer "Major Tompkins," to tow the "Jeff.Davis" to Fort Townsend, a distance of 75 miles, for $600, which service was performed.The "Jeff.Davis" now proceeded to the scene of the wreck, but found it impracticable to land or to take off the passengers of the Southerner, and returned to Fort Townsend without them.It was now agreed, in consultation of the several United States officers at that place, that the "M~ajor Tompkins' ' should at once proceed to the relief of the sufferers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".