Resilience and the Village Forest Commons in the Context of Economic and Urban Growth, Manali, H.P., India
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"The village forest commons in the Kullu District of the Western Himalayas forms an integral part of the local system of land use and land management. Recent development and expansion of the tourism industry and commercial horticulture has resulted in increased pressure on the forests in the area and therefore also on the larger social-ecological system. This analysis focuses on the institutions in the area that contribute to the management of the forest and specifically on the institutional responses to changes to the forest resulting from recent pressures. The state Forest Department, the mahila mandal (village women's organization), joint forest management committees, and village level rules-in-use are institutions considered that operate at various levels and contribute to the management of the forests in the Kullu District. Institutional responses such as the establishment of fuelwood depots and forest watches are assessed as to whether their actions promoting the resilience of the social- ecological system. This paper is a collaborative effort, primarily based on field research carried out in the area surrounding the town of Manali in Himachal Pradesh, India in the summer and fall of 1999. Three villages in the area were selected as case studies and the paper draws on the comments of local people recorded during semi- structured interviews."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it