Report on the 22nd Annual DGfS Meeting in Marburg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Annual DGfS Meeting in Marburg, GermanyThe DGfS (Deutsche Gesellschaft fr Sprachwissenschaft, German Society for Linguistics) organizes the largest European conference on linguistics.The annual meetings are held towards the end of February/beginning of March each year at varying places in Germany.Twelve workshops on different linguistic aspects, usually six on the main conference theme, six ranging freely from phonetics to text linguistics, offer an opportunity for everyone to present a paper and/or to participate in the discussions.Conference languages are German and English and occasionally French.Information can be found on the website http://coral.lili.uni-bielefeld.de/DGfS/.The 22nd Annual Meeting of the DGfS was held from March 1-3, 2000 in Marburg.The conference theme was "The word -structures and concepts".This year, there were 539 participants from all over the world.About 190 papers were presented by researchers from Europe, the United States and Canada, Asia, Africa, Australia and New Zealand in 12 parallel workshops, covering numerous linguistic areas, including parts of speech, conceptualization and grammaticalization, case, graphemic structures, phonology, word finding in acquisition and aphasia, and others.Papers in the workshops ranged from various aspects of linguistic theory and language modeling to language acquisition and loss.Usually, some of the organizers of a workshop decide to publish the papers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".