MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7071092133

Quantum Simulation Algorithms with Applications to Quantum Error Correction and Topological Data Analysis

2023· dissertation· en· W7071092133 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoStrykerUniversity of Washington
KeywordsQuantum error correctionQuantum algorithmQuantumQuantum phase estimation algorithmQuantum computerError detection and correctionTopology (electrical circuits)Quantum operation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents three results of relevance to the simulation of quantum dynamics on quantum computers. The first is the development of hybridized methods of quantum simulation with Alessandro Roggero and Nathan Wiebe. Conventional methods of quantum simulation, such as qDRIFT, Trotterization, and qubitization, involve trade-offs that limit their applicability to specific contexts where their use is optimal. We develop a framework that allows different simulation methods to be hybridized via the interaction picture and thereby improve performance for interaction picture simulations over known algorithms. These approaches show asymptotic improvements over the individual methods that comprise them and further make interaction picture simulation methods practical in the near term. Physical applications of these hybridized methods yield a gate complexity scaling as $\log^2 \Lambda$ in the electric cutoff $\Lambda$ for the Schwinger model and independent of the electron density for collective neutrino oscillations, outperforming the scaling for all current algorithms with these parameters. For the general problem of Hamiltonian simulation subject to dynamical constraints, these methods yield a query complexity independent of the penalty parameter $\lambda$ used to impose an energy cost on time-evolution into an unphysical subspace. Our second result concerns fault-tolerant error correction procedures developed with Alessandro Roggero and Nathan Wiebe for certain lattice gauge theories (LGTs) with a view towards simulating their dynamics on quantum computers. Quantum simulations of LGTs are often formulated on an enlarged Hilbert space containing both physical and unphysical sectors in order to retain a local Hamiltonian. We provide simple fault-tolerant procedures that exploit such redundancy by combining a phase flip error correction code with the intrinsic Gauss' law gauge symmetry to correct one-qubit errors for a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ or truncated U(1) LGT in 1+1 and 2+1 dimensions with a link flux cutoff of $1$. Unlike existing work on detecting violations of Gauss' law, our circuits are fault tolerant and the overall error correction scheme outperforms a na\"{i}ve application of the $[5,1,3]$ code. The constructions outlined can be extended to LGT systems with larger cutoffs and can be used in understanding how to hybridize error correction and quantum simulation for LGTs in higher space-time dimensions and with different symmetry groups. Lastly, we present a classical randomized algorithm developed with Nathan Wiebe for topological data analysis, the problem of determining the approximate Betti numbers of simplicial complexes constructed from data sets. This problem has attracted considerable interest in recent years due to claims of exponential advantage for this task on quantum computers over classical methods such as Gaussian elimination or the Lanczos algorithm that scale exponentially with the size of the input. Our algorithm demonstrates a partial dequantization of this problem via the classical simulation of the imaginary time-evolution of the combinatorial Laplacian with the path integral Monte Carlo method. We show this algorithm can extract approximate Betti numbers in polynomial time in some of the same regimes where quantum computers were claimed to provide exponential advantage over classical computers. This implies that having exponentially large dimension and Betti number are necessary but not sufficient conditions for super-polynomial advantage on quantum computers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)→Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→