MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071152231

Reasons for not having received influenza vaccination and its predictors in Canadians

2012· article· en· W7071152231 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHistory, Culture, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaccinationEpidemiologyPublic healthInfluenza vaccineImmunizationConfidence interval
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yue Chen,1 Jun Wu,2 Qi-long Yi,1 Julie Laroche,3 Thomas Wong21Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 2Professional Guidelines and Public Health Practice Division, Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, 3Immunization Assessment and Information, Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaBackground: Influenza vaccination is the most effective way to prevent influenza. However, only about one-third of Canadians receive an annual seasonal influenza vaccination.Methods: The reasons for not having received influenza vaccination were examined among 131,061 Canadians ≥ 12 years of age who participated in a national survey in 2007–2008. Among them, 127,297 subjects responded to the questions concerning their flu shot history and were grouped into three categories: never (n = 51,767), 1+ year ago (n = 29,310), last year (n = 46,220). Subjects who reported not having had a flu shot during the past year were asked the reasons for not having it. The log binomial regression model was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the associations of various reasons for not having received influenza vaccination and their predictors.Results: When weighted to the Canadian population, 44.0% had never previously received influenza vaccine and 24.5% had received the vaccine > 12 months ago. The most common reasons for not having received influenza vaccination in the past 12 months were “Respondent did not think it necessary” (71.3%) and “Have not gotten around to it” (17.6%). Log binomial regression analysis shows that females were less likely to report these two reasons compared to males with PRs of 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) and 0.84 (0.81, 0.87), respectively. Younger participants were more likely to report, “Have not gotten around to it.” For those who had an influenza vaccination previously, the primary reason for not having an influenza vaccination in the last year was “Have not gotten around to it.”Conclusions: More than two-thirds of Canadians 12+ years of age did not receive an influenza vaccination in the past year, and “Respondent did not think it necessary” and “Have not gotten around to it” were the main reasons.Keywords: Canada, flu shot, human, influenza, survey, vaccination

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.362
GPT teacher head0.603
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHistory, Culture, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207