MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071162854

Segon registre d'Asensidea asensii Calzada, 2002 (Gastropoda), caragol continental del Miocè, a la Todolella (els Ports; NE península Ibèrica)

2023· article· ca· W7071162854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotteryNova scotiaContext (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Els estudis de gasteròpodes continentals no són molt freqüents, per contrast amb l'abundant bibliografia sobre \nels fòssils marins. A la comarca dels Ports l'única espècie de gasteròpode terrestre descrita fins ara és Asensidea \nasensii Calzada, 2002. Però des de la descripció original no s'havia tornat a retrobar. La troballa d'un nou jaciment \nen una nova localitat ha motivat la redacció d'aquesta nota. \nTot i que el material recuperat consisteix en motlles interns, sense cap resta de conquilla, que ha estat dissolta per \nprocessos tafonòmics, s'ha pogut classificar l'espècie per la seua forma característica, troquiforme, les mesures \nindicades al treball original, la fauna d'acompanyament i la continuïtat de l'aflorament. El nou jaciment se situa \na uns 6 Km en línia recta de la localitat tipus del mas de Mateu (Olocau del Rey, els Ports). \nS'ha precisat l'adscripció administrativa de la localitat tipus. S'ha actualitzat la sistemàtica paleontològica, \nd'acord a les aportacions recents. S'ha ampliat la distribució geogràfica de l'espècie amb el nou jaciment de \nl'assagador de les Refoies (la Todolella, els Ports) i es diposita material en un altre museu de proximitat. \nS'apunta la conveniència de realitzar noves prospeccions al Miocè continental de Terol a la recerca de més localitats d'A. asensii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicGeological and Geophysical Studies WorldwideFrench-language works237,207