MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071198726

Sir Isaac Lothian Bell 116741

2013· other· en· W7071198726 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQR Code Applications and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBARGEPort (circuit theory)West virginiaQueen (butterfly)George (robot)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pictured is the vessel "Black River, originally named "Sir Issac Lothian Bell." The “Sir Isaac Lothian Bell” was built in 1896 by F.W. Wheeler & Co. of West Bay City, Michigan. The steel barge experienced numerous ownership transfers and name changes. From 1896 until 1901, she was owned by the Bessemer Steamship Co., of Duluth, Minnesota. In 1901, she was purchased by the Pittsburgh Steamship Co., of Cleveland, Ohio. They owned her until 1936, when ownership was attained by Pigeon Timber Co., Ltd., of Port Arthur, Ontario, Canada. Under their ownership, she was renamed “Blanche H.” In 1938, she was purchased by Lakehead Transportation Co., Ltd. of Fort William, Ont. They owned the vessel until 1942, when ownership transferred to Great Lakes Lumber & Shipping, Ltd., also of Fort William. From 1949 until 1979, she was owned by Quebec & Ontario Transportation Co., Ltd., of Montreal, Canada. They renamed her “Black River,” and in 1952, she was converted to a motorship. From 1979 until 1983, she was owned by Carib Sud Co., of Port Colborne, Panama. When ownership transferred, she was renamed “Tuxpancliffe.” In March 1983, the vessel was scrapped in Corpus Christi, Texas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5300.299

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Same topicQR Code Applications and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207