MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071207716

Search for CP violation and a measurement of the relative branching fraction in D+âK-K+Ï+ decays

2005· article· en· W7071207716 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstitute of High Energy PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungAlfred P. Sloan FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCP violationBranching fractionAsymmetryNormalization (sociology)Branching (polymer chemistry)Fraction (chemistry)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on a search for the CP asymmetry in the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D+→K-K+π+ and in the resonant decays D+→π+ and D+→K̄*0K+ based on a data sample of 79.9fb-1 recorded by the BABAR detector. We use the Cabibbo-favored Ds+→K-K+π+ branching fraction as normalization in the measurements to reduce systematic uncertainties. The CP asymmetries obtained are ACP(K-K+π±)=(1.4±1.0(stat)±0. 8(syst))×10-2, ACP(π±)=(0.2±1.5(stat)±0.6(syst)) ×10-2, and ACP(K̄*0K±)=(0.9±1.7(stat)±0. 7(syst))×10-2. The relative branching fraction Γ(D+→K-K+π+)/ Γ(D+→K-π+π+) is also measured and is found to be (10.7±0.1(stat)±0.2(syst))×10-2. © 2005 The American Physical Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207