Sistemas alimentarios territorializados en Costa Rica: 100 iniciativas locales para la alimentación responsable y sostenible
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La investigación conjunta e interdisciplinaria entre la Cátedra de Investigación en Derecho sobre la Diversidad y la Seguridad Alimentarias de la Universidad Laval de Canadá; el Programa de Investigación en Derecho Sanitario del Instituto de Investigaciones de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Costa Rica; Résolis France5 ; la Chaire Unesco en alimentations du Monde6 de la Universidad de Montpellier y Sciences Po Paris7, permitió la conclusión del presente estudio. Este trabajo se integra a las iniciativas desarrolladas en el marco de la Declaración de Québec, del 2 de octubre de 20158. La problemática de investigación consistió en determinar si en Costa Rica existen initiativas que se integran dentro de sistemas alimentarios territorializados. Para ello se realizó la identificación, selección y análisis comparativo de cien iniciativas que contribuyen a desarrollar sistemas alimentarios territorializados en este país. El documento se estructura en cuatro partes: (A) las consideraciones metodológicas; (B) los hallazgos; (C) las conclusiones y (D) la lista categorizada de las iniciativas según la principal externalidad, ubicación, tipo de acción y externalidades secundarias.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".