MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071257968

Real-Time Monitoring of Thermal Processes

2023· dissertation· en· W7071257968 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsThermalProcess (computing)Quality assuranceWeldingThermal energyThermal radiationInfraredThermography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research, a monitoring system for thermal processes was developed which measures the most critical process phenomena, such as thermal dynamics (peak temperature, heating rate, and cooling rate) and geometric features, in real-time, which can be used for quality assurance and real-time feedback control. Thermal processes are a subset of manufacturing processes that are characterized by heating materials with a concentrated heat source to alter the properties of the materials or join them. Metal additive manufacturing and arc welding processes are considered thermal processes, where the concentrated energy source may be in the form of a laser, electron beam, electric arc, etc. While thermal processes can be used to create complex components without the limitations of traditional manufacturing, process disturbances may cause deviations from expected results. \n During thermal processing, geometry and thermal dynamics of the heat affected zone (HAZ) directly influence the quality of the produced products. Therefore, it is critical to have an accurate tool to monitor the geometry and thermal dynamics in real time to better assure the quality of the part. Various sensors are available to measure these properties, though imaging is a common theme among thermal process monitoring. Imaging is an effective technique since it allows for non-contact in-situ measurements. Imaging in different wavelengths can provide different information regarding the HAZ, such as the temperature distribution from infrared (IR) light. While high resolution, and high frame rate geometry measurements from visible light can be monitored directly. Moreover, processing images with machine learning algorithms has also been shown to be capable of predicting porosity and detecting defects in the part being manufactured. Therefore, the monitoring system designed in this research features high dynamic range (HDR) visible light and IR dual camera sensors with a common optical path to monitor the geometry and thermal dynamics, with the potential to implement machine learning to monitor other features in the future. An enclosure was designed to house both sensors with a common optical setup for the sensors to have a similar field of view (FOV). \n In this work, the IR sensor was used to create a dataset to predict the temperature distribution of the HAZ with the HDR sensor. From the temperature distribution, thermal dynamics such as peak temperature, cooling rate, heating rate, solidification time, and melting time were calculated in real-time to estimate the material properties of the final part. The HDR sensor was also used to predict the geometry of the deposited material (clad). Using the same sensors, the height and width of the deposition are estimated from the captured images in real-time which are used for deposition geometry control. The geometry prediction algorithm evolved during this work with different algorithms and features used in the measurements to improve the robustness and accuracy of geometry measurements. \n To test the effectiveness of the monitoring system, laser heat treatment (LHT) experiments were conducted to initially validate the thermal dynamics measurements. Thermal dynamics were then further validated during laser directed energy deposition (LDED), which was additionally used to validate the geometry measurements of the clad. Moreover, gas metal arc welding (GMAW) experiments were conducted as well to demonstrate the potential for using this system for different energy sources and materials. \n The developed dual sensor camera was shown to be capable of capturing images in real-time during thermal processes. Processing the visible-light images allows the geometry of the HAZ to be monitored, while the IR sensor provides its temperature distribution. The system was shown to be robust enough to capture data with multiple materials (stainless steel and nickel-based alloys) and with different energy sources (laser and electric arc). The thermal dynamics measured with this tool have been shown to correlate to the material properties of the produced parts, thus demonstrating the potential to infer the material properties from these measurements. It has also been shown that a cost-effective alternative design using the visible light sensor to predict the temperature distribution with calibrated measurements from a pyrometer may be used for temperature measurements in thermal processes. Therefore, the developed monitoring system is shown to be an effective monitoring and control tool for various thermal processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207