MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071460213

Stakeholders perspectives on sport hunting, conservation, and ecosystem sustainability in British Columbia, Canada

2018· article· en· W7071460213 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQR Code Applications and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)BushmeatOrder (exchange)Work (physics)Sustainability
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hunting as a wildlife conservation tool has been the centre of much debate as climate\nchange, the decline of carnivores, and increased pressure from human encroachment threaten\nwildlife species globally. There has also been increases in the popularity of sport hunting and\nheightened editorial coverage of conservation stories. This has led to polarizing views on\nhunting for wildlife management. This thesis takes a critical look at these issues from the\nperspective of hunting stakeholders. The objective was to emphasize the importance of\nacknowledging diverse stakeholders in these discussions as they have unique knowledge of\nland and wildlife systems that are integral to sustainability. A community-based participatory\nresearch (CBPR) methodology was utilized in order to access the complex relationships\nwithin the hunting industry. This methodology enabled the effective engagement of hunting\ncommunities in order to identify their key concerns and recognize the knowledge and\nabilities of participants. Data was collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with\nresident hunters, conservation officers, wildlife biologists, guide outfitters, hunting suppliers,\nand Indigenous hunters. Topics of stereotyping, sustainability, inclusion, stakeholder\nrelationships, and the power of social influence within the hunting industry were\ninvestigated. The findings were divided into four distinct chapters. Chapter one identifies the\ncurrent gaps in literature that exist regarding hunting and wildlife management as well as\nprovides an overview of the methodology utilized. Chapter two, establishes an overview of\nB.C.’s hunting industry from the perspective of resident hunters. There is specific focus on\nthe lack of consultation of stakeholders in decision-making and policy development and\nstereotypes created in the media. In the third chapter, the complexity of relationships between\nhumans, wildlife, and contemporary stakeholders within B.C.’s hunting industry are\nexamined. Additionally, the role of humans within ecosystem structures are contemplated by\nthe participants. How contemporary issues associated with hunting in B.C. relate to larger\nconcerns regarding land-use within the province are discussed in the final chapter. This\nresearch provides insight into the current state of the hunting industry, hunting’s role in\nwildlife management, and the sensitive needs of stakeholders in their efforts to promote the\nhealth and conservation of wildlife populations. The results inform inclusive policies that\nbalance the needs of local peoples, communities, and ecosystem conservation. The findings\nalso educate the general public on the role of hunting in B.C. in an effort to produce solutions\nthat ensure the long-term health of both regional ecosystems and hunting economies within\nthe province. This research contributes to the further development of sustainable sport\nhunting and conservation economies as well as to the broader discussions surrounding landuse\nin the province. As climate change, ongoing land-use conflicts, natural resource\nextraction, and the expansion of the global human population threaten ecosystems, leaders\nare facing a growing dilemma around how to balance sustainable use of B.C. lands while\nsupporting provincials and federal economies. Amidst this crisis, it is even more imperative\nto consider stakeholders in decision-making processes because their unique perspectives on\nwildlife and ecosystems, could be critical to evaluate and eventually determine the future of\nprovincial land-use management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it