Stakeholders perspectives on sport hunting, conservation, and ecosystem sustainability in British Columbia, Canada
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hunting as a wildlife conservation tool has been the centre of much debate as climate\nchange, the decline of carnivores, and increased pressure from human encroachment threaten\nwildlife species globally. There has also been increases in the popularity of sport hunting and\nheightened editorial coverage of conservation stories. This has led to polarizing views on\nhunting for wildlife management. This thesis takes a critical look at these issues from the\nperspective of hunting stakeholders. The objective was to emphasize the importance of\nacknowledging diverse stakeholders in these discussions as they have unique knowledge of\nland and wildlife systems that are integral to sustainability. A community-based participatory\nresearch (CBPR) methodology was utilized in order to access the complex relationships\nwithin the hunting industry. This methodology enabled the effective engagement of hunting\ncommunities in order to identify their key concerns and recognize the knowledge and\nabilities of participants. Data was collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with\nresident hunters, conservation officers, wildlife biologists, guide outfitters, hunting suppliers,\nand Indigenous hunters. Topics of stereotyping, sustainability, inclusion, stakeholder\nrelationships, and the power of social influence within the hunting industry were\ninvestigated. The findings were divided into four distinct chapters. Chapter one identifies the\ncurrent gaps in literature that exist regarding hunting and wildlife management as well as\nprovides an overview of the methodology utilized. Chapter two, establishes an overview of\nB.C.’s hunting industry from the perspective of resident hunters. There is specific focus on\nthe lack of consultation of stakeholders in decision-making and policy development and\nstereotypes created in the media. In the third chapter, the complexity of relationships between\nhumans, wildlife, and contemporary stakeholders within B.C.’s hunting industry are\nexamined. Additionally, the role of humans within ecosystem structures are contemplated by\nthe participants. How contemporary issues associated with hunting in B.C. relate to larger\nconcerns regarding land-use within the province are discussed in the final chapter. This\nresearch provides insight into the current state of the hunting industry, hunting’s role in\nwildlife management, and the sensitive needs of stakeholders in their efforts to promote the\nhealth and conservation of wildlife populations. The results inform inclusive policies that\nbalance the needs of local peoples, communities, and ecosystem conservation. The findings\nalso educate the general public on the role of hunting in B.C. in an effort to produce solutions\nthat ensure the long-term health of both regional ecosystems and hunting economies within\nthe province. This research contributes to the further development of sustainable sport\nhunting and conservation economies as well as to the broader discussions surrounding landuse\nin the province. As climate change, ongoing land-use conflicts, natural resource\nextraction, and the expansion of the global human population threaten ecosystems, leaders\nare facing a growing dilemma around how to balance sustainable use of B.C. lands while\nsupporting provincials and federal economies. Amidst this crisis, it is even more imperative\nto consider stakeholders in decision-making processes because their unique perspectives on\nwildlife and ecosystems, could be critical to evaluate and eventually determine the future of\nprovincial land-use management.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle