MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071475566

Strutture castrensi, ricerca sul campo, rilievi cartografici. La stagione del Neomedievalismo nell’Appennino faentino

2022· article· en· W7071475566 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiddle AgesExcavationPeriod (music)Quarter (Canadian coin)ProspectionPlan (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper highlights the period of Neomedievalism in the Apennine of Faenza (Province of Ravenna, Northern Italy), between the last quarter of the 19th century and the early 20th century. On the basis of a cultural reconsideration of the Middle Ages, the castles of the area were not only studied on the basis of sources and bibliography as before, but also visited on the field and frequently mapped. The contribution discusses the maps of three castles (Mt. Mauro and Rontana, in the municipality of Brisighella, and Mt. Battaglia, in the municipality of Casola Valsenio), analyzing their degree of cartographical accuracy and the background of the respective map-makers. In the case of the castle of Rontana, the paper compares also the maps with the factual plan of the medieval structures, as visible today after the extensive archaeological excavations undertaken here, in the last decade ca., by the archaeologists of the University of Bologna.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)Same topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207