“The sword of enthusiasm is just as good as the sword of genius”: An Organizational and Cultural History of The Young Communist League of Canada, 1922-1934
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Young people gravitated in large numbers to the Communist movement in Canada and around the world in the 1920s and 1930s. Much like the youth of today, they did so with many specific issues in mind – education, health and recreation, trade unionism, peace, gender equality, cultural autonomy – that distinguished their Communism from left movements of the past. To an extent that the existing historiography is only beginning to register, they were not passive recipients of a party line designed in Moscow and implemented in Toronto, but active shapers of their own versions of leftism, one that at times brought them into direct conflict with their party elders. To a surprising extent, because they could counterbalance the demands of the leaders of the Communist Party of Canada (CPC) with the sometimes-conflicting perspectives of the Comintern and the Young Communist International (YCI), they enjoyed substantial room to manoeuvre within a movement falsely reputed to be an authoritarian monolith. “To be educated and educators in turn” – Lenin’s dialectical description of the position of young people in the party – captured much about what some young people found empowering about their experience with the Young Communist League (YCL). Although rarely recognized as such, their activism made the 1920s and early 1930s a rival of the more renowned 1960s and 1970s as years of a dynamic, paradigm-challenging youth movement. By examining the work of the Young Communist League of Canada, working above all with the new sources made available with the opening of the Comintern’s archive, new insights can be attained on how the Canadian left was both supported by, and challenged by, Communist youth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.045 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".