MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071511841

Seismic assessment of a hybrid light wood-frame structure connected to a balloon-type CLT core

2023· dissertation· en· W7071511841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWood Treatment and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipationQuasistatic processSeismic analysisStiffnessCore (optical fiber)ResidualRange (aeronautics)Shear wall
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Light wood-frame structures are the most common type of construction for residential and low-rise buildings in North America. The 2015 edition of the National Building Code of Canada has increased the height limit for light wood-frame construction from 4 to 6 stories. With the increase in building height, the design of light wood-frame structures may be more likely governed by inter-story drift under wind and seismic loads. To reduce the inter-story drift, a hybrid system, consisting of CLT cores and light wood-frame structures, is proposed in this study. Given the lack of design guidelines on the performance of hybrid wood structures under seismic loads, it is imperative to gain a comprehensive understanding of their performance under earthquake load that includes the hybrid performance, as well as performance of individual sub-structure and inter-structure connections. The first part of this study focuses on assessing the influence of energy dissipation due to different pinching levels on the seismic performance of individual sub-structure, i.e., a light wood-frame shear wall system, over a wide range of fundamental periods. The study revealed that structures with periods less 0.7 s are more susceptible to the effects of hysteresis loop pinching than long-period structures. The residual strength of pinching loops has a greater influence on the seismic performance than the stiffness of the pinching loops. Hysteretic energy dissipation derived from standard reversed-cyclic tests can provide a better understanding on the seismic resistance of timber structures. However, the hysteretic energy under a seismic event at near-collapse stage neither agrees with quasistatic cyclic test’s energy dissipation nor is well correlated to the maximum seismic capacity of the structure. In the second part of this study, monotonic and reversed-cyclic tests were conducted on the connections between the two subsystems in the proposed hybrid building. The CLT core and light wood-frame structures were connected on the floor level with self-tapping screws (STSs) inserted at 45°, 90°, and mixed angles (45° and 90°). Results show that 45° STSs connections had high stiffness but low energy dissipation, while 90° STS connections had high energy dissipation but low stiffness. Mixed-angle Connections had significantly higher ductility and energy dissipation compared to connections with STSs only inserted at 45° or 90°. The final part of this study investigated the effect of STS connection ductility on the seismic performance of a hybrid building consisting of light wood-frame shear walls and a balloon-type CLT core. The National Building Code of Canada requires the lowest seismic force modification factors (RdRo) of the subsystems be used for the design of a hybrid building if the subsystems are rigidly connected, which may be conservative if a ductile connection is used. Therefore, a numerical study was conducted to determine the possibility of utilizing higher RdRo values for the design of the proposed hybrid structures. Hybrid models were developed where the two subsystems were connected using STS inserted at 45°, 90°, and mixed angles (45° + 90°). Pure light wood-frame structures and pure CLT structures were also analyzed as reference cases. One-, four- and six-storey archetypes were designed with trial RdRo factors. The OpenSees software was used to develop a 2D numerical model for each archetype. The RdRo of the five analyzed cases was evaluated following the Canadian Construction Materials Centre guideline and using the 22 FEMA P695 far-field ground motions. The results show that Rd = 2 and Ro = 1.5 are acceptable for cases of pure CLT structures, and hybrid structures connected using STS inserted at 45° and 90°. The hybrid buildings connected using STS inserted at mixed angles (45° + 90°) can be assigned with Rd = 2.5 and Ro = 1.5. The archetypes designed with Rd = 3 and Ro = 1.7 are deemed satisfactory for pure light wood-frame structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicWood Treatment and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207