MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071536474

Subgroups in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Exploring Age Groups, Latent Profile Classes, and Latent Class Trajectories of Functional Impairment

2023· dissertation· en· W7071536474 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpin vísindi (Opin vísindi) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthErasmus+Medical Research CouncilSahlgrenska UniversitetssjukhusetRegion MidtjyllandTrygFondenLeifur Eiríksson FoundationStiftelsen Clas Groschinskys MinnesfondNational Health and Medical Research CouncilNorges ForskningsrådHáskóli ÍslandsBC Children's HospitalMichael Smith Health Research BCUS-UK Fulbright CommissionStrategiske Forskningsråd
KeywordsFunctional impairmentLatent class modelQuality of life (healthcare)ComorbidityDiseaseAge of onsetSocial relationshipAnxietyAge groups
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is debilitating and often chronic, associated with significant social and educational impairment as well as reduced quality of life. OCD can present with highly heterogenous symptom profiles. Although it is characterized by the functional relationship between obsessions and compulsions, the specific content of the obsessions and the topology of the compulsions varies greatly between individuals and can fluctuate over time within individuals. Identifying subgroups of children and adolescents with OCD based on symptom expression and associated features, such as comorbid psychopathology, can potentially shed additional light on common clinical presentations, offer insights regarding potential underlying transdiagnostic processes, and lead to improved specificity of care.
\nAims: The current thesis aims to identify, explore, and compare subgroups of children and adolescents based on their age at assessment, age of OCD symptom onset, duration of OCD symptoms, symptom expression, demographics, comorbid psychopathology, and long-term functional impairment treatment response. 
\nMethod: Study I examined subgroups based on age, comparing adolescents (age 12-17) and children (age 7-11), participating in an OCD treatment trial (n=269). In addition, subgroups based on age of OCD onset, prepubertal or adolescent, were compared within the older age group. Lastly, subgroups based on the duration of OCD illness were compared. The subgroups were, in all instances, compared in terms of: (1) OCD severity, (2) OCD symptom profile, (3) comorbid symptoms, and (4) OCD-related functional impairment. Study II used an aggregated international sample of 830 OCD-affected children and adolescents, presenting to OCD specialty centers. First, a factor analysis was conducted to establish a factor structure of OCD symptoms. Second, a dependent mixture model was employed to identify latent clusters representing subgroups of OCD-affected children and adolescents based on symptom factor scores, symptom severity, and the presence or absence of comorbid disorders. Third, relationships of subgroup membership with other clinically relevant variables, including the age of symptom onset, avoidance, impairment, and family accommodation were explored. Study III examined the long-term trajectory of OCD-related functional impairment during and after stepped-care treatment, in a longitudinal analysis of the same sample as used in study I. A latent class growth analysis was conducted to identify trajectories of child and adolescent self-reported OCD-related functional impairment over three years (170 weeks). Trajectory classes were compared on pretreatment characteristics. To identify predictors of trajectory class membership a multinomial logistic regression model was used. The overlap of the identified functional impairment trajectory classes with previously established OCD symptom severity trajectory classes was also explored. 
\nResults: In study I, younger children were found to have poorer level of insight, higher rates of ADHD, and disruptive disorders. The older group had higher levels of mental compulsions, miscellaneous obsessions and compulsions, and self-rated functional impairment. No differences were found in the prevalence of anxiety, tic, or depressive disorders between the age groups, nor in overall OCD severity. Defining groups by age of OCD onset and duration of illness rather than age at evaluation did not change results, with no further clear differences emerging. In study II, a six-factor model of OCD symptoms was identified and used as a basis for the dependent mixture model. Fit statistics favored a four-cluster latent class model with groups distinguished primarily by symptom expression and comorbidity type. Fit indices for three to seven cluster models were only marginally different and characteristics of the clusters remained largely stable between solutions with small clusters of distinct presentations added in more complex models. In study III, three distinct long-term functional impairment trajectory classes were identified. The largest class (70.7%) initiated treatment with lower functional impairment. This group experienced a moderate reduction in impairment, which was maintained over the long term. The second class (24.4%) initiated with higher functional impairment which rapidly diminished over time. The third and smallest class (4.9%), initiated with moderate functional impairment which remained unchanged over the study period. The classes differed on measures of OCD severity and comorbid symptoms. 
\nConclusions: Study I found fewer overall differences between the age groups than most previous studies. However, in line with extant literature, less insight, higher levels of ADHD, and more disruptive problems in younger children, and higher self-rated functional impairment in older children, was found. Rather than identifying a single classification system, the findings from study II support the utility of integrating dimensional, developmental, and transdiagnostic information in the conceptualization of OCD-affected children and adolescents. The clusters identified in study II point to the centrality of contamination concerns in OCD, relationships between broader symptom expression and higher levels of comorbidity, and the potential for complex/neurodevelopmental presentations. Study III found that most patients receiving stepped-care treatment improved and maintained low levels of impairment for over three years, regardless of initial level of impairment. However, a small subgroup, distinguished by higher levels of ADHD symptoms, remained at pretreatment levels of impairment throughout.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpin vísindi (Opin vísindi)Same topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207