MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071653886

Transmission Spectroscopy with the ACE-FTS Infrared Spectral Atlas of Earth: A Model Validation and Sensitivity Study

2018· other· en· W7071653886 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venueelib (German Aerospace Center) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMODTRANSatelliteAtmospheric temperatureSpectral lineAtmospheric composition
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ACE-FTS, the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment - Fourier Transform Spectrometer onboard the Canadian Earth observation satellite "SciSat" is recording solar occultation spectra for about fifteen years. Five infrared atmospheric atlases for arctic summer and winter, midlatitude summer and winter, and the tropics and 31 limb rays (6 - 128 km) have been created by co-adding hundreds of cloud-free infrared spectra (2.2 - 13.3 mue) (Hughes et al., JQSRT 2014). These spectra provide a unique opportunity for model validation and to study the impact of individual molecules, spectral resolution, molecular spectroscopy data (HITRAN, GEISA, continua, etc.), and auxiliary data. Here we use GARLIC - Generic Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Line-by-Line Infrared Code (Schreier et al., JQSRT 2014) and compare observed and modeled "effective height spectra" obtained by integrating (summming) the entire limb sequence. This kind of spectra are typically used for remote sensing of (exo-)planetary atmospheres by transit spectroscopy, where only disk-averaged observations are possible. The Earth effective height spectrum varies between a few kilometers (in atmospheric window regions) and about 50 km in the CO2 v2 and v3 bands with small variations due to season and latitude. The largest impact on the transit spectra is due to water, carbon dioxide, ozone, methane, nitrous oxide, nitrogen, nitric acid, oxygen, and some chlorofluorocarbons (CFC11 and CFC12). The effect of further molecules considered in the modeling is either marginal or absent. The impact of spectroscopic input data on the model spectra is small. The best matching model with 17 molecules absorbing has a mean residuum of 0.4 km and a maximum difference of 2 km to the measured effective height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueelib (German Aerospace Center)French-language works237,207