The syllabus of the regional component of professionally motivational education developed for the students specializing in tourism
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
© Canadian Center of Science and Education. The development of types and forms of tourism in the regions of the Russian Federation is connected with the socio-cultural and economic transformations of the tourism market, which conditions continuous improvement of the system of professional tourism education at all levels. The expansion of tourism relations and tourism activities in the district, city, region defines the variety of professional tourism education. The article explains the syllabus of the regional component within general and special subjects, determining professional motivation of students majoring in Tourism in Gzhel region of developed folk arts and crafts. It also provides such forms of extracurricular work with the students to promote effective professionally motivational education in the forms of competitions, contests, touristic fairs, Month tourism, meetings with representatives of the actively developing touristic countries, probation in tourism, charity events for Gzhel schoolchildren-the excursions with animation program and others. In general, the results of the pilot work suggest the viability of the proposed syllabus of the regional component in professionally motivational training of the students majoring in Tourism in the region with the developed of folk arts and crafts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it