Sursis, récidive et réinsertion sociale : un équilibre précaire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conditional sentence has been called a “hybrid” sentence because it aims at punitive and rehabilitative objectives simultaneously. In this study, we contrast the effects of punitive and rehabilitative conditions on breaches, revocations, recidivism, and social re-entry. The study is based on secondary data analysis. Files of male offenders who were given a one-year conditional sentence in the province of Quebec between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2004 were analysed (N = 290). Findings indicate that punitive conditions have no impact on rates of recidivism and social re-entry but increase the likelihood that breaches will be detected. Repeated violations, in turn, increase the odds of revocation. At the same time, rehabilitative conditions were found to lower the risk of breaches, facilitate social re-entry, and, as a result, reduce recidivism. Rehabilitation and social re-entry, then, should continue to be the main goal of conditional sentences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it