Turkish Nationalism on its Birth: The Journal of Türk Yurdu (1911-1918)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Özet19. yüzyılın son çeyreğinde filizlenmeye başlayan Türk milliyetçiliği yirminci yüzyılın ilkçeyreğinde Türkiye’de en önemli siyasi hareket haline geldi. Bu dönemde Türk milliyetçiliğininen önemli yayın organı Türk Yurdu (1911-1931) dergisiydi. Rusya kökenli Türk milliyetçileritarafından yayınlanmaya başlayan bu dergi, kısa sürede dönemin en önde gelen Türkmilliyetçilerinin yazdığı ve milliyetçi bir çerçeveden Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’ndaki siyasi,toplumsal ve iktisadi gelişmeleri değerlendirdiği bir platform haline dönüştü. Bu makalenintemel amacı Türk Yurdu’nun siyasi, toplumsal ve iktisadi gelişmeleri nasıl yaklaştığınıincelemektir. Bu anlamda, makale temel olarak bahsi geçen dönemde Türk Yurdu’nun yerinive önemini incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.Anahtar Sözcükler: Türk Milliyetçiliği, İkinci Meşrutiyet Dönemi, İttihat ve TerakkiCemiyeti, Milli Ekonomi, Yusuf Akçura AbstractTurkish nationalism sprang into being during the last quarter of the nineteenth centuryand became the most fundamental political movement in the first quarter of the twentieethcentury in Turkey. The most important publication of Turkish nationalist movement of thisperiod is Türk Yurdu. This journal (1911-1931) was published by Russian originated Turkishnationalists and soon after its start of release in 1911 it quickly turned into a platform where themost prominent nationalist figures of the Ottoman Empire wrote for the journal and debatedabout the political, social, economic issues of the Empire from nationalist perspective. Themain aim of this article is to examine how Türk Yurdu approached to the political, social andeconomic issues in the Ottoman Empire? And in this sense, this article mainly asks what is theposition and importance of this journal in its time?Keywords: Turkish Nationalism, The Second Constitutional Era, The Committee of Unionand Progress, The National Economy, Yusuf Akçura.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".