The Universe of Atom Egoyan : the aesthetics of paradox
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le cinéma d’Atom Egoyan présente la particularité d’être difficilement classable, par son obstination à maintenir son caractère "fermé", sans craindre d’explorer ses possibilités dans des champs cinématographiques divers. Le sentiment de perte de sens, qui traverse l’organisation de son œuvre, semble jouer le rôle le plus important quant à la réception de ses films. La recherche essaye de commenter son univers filmique captivant, préférant l’examiner par l’autre côté, là où il se tait et se cache, tout en empêchant la lecture lucide d’une analyse filmique. Se fondant d’abord sur le rôle capital du découpage, nous essayons de comprendre comment le cinéaste canadien bâtit son univers aporétique, à l’aide de toute sorte de figure de juxtaposition. Essayer d’assimiler la construction d’un tel univers d’observer comment les personnages, finalement, y vivent. Lutter contre l’inquiétude, qui touche parfois même la terreur, équivaut, chez Egoyan à la lutte de ses personnages contre le découpage. La perte de sens, ne pourrait qu’être le résultat d’une vérité filmique désarmée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".