MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071869874

The untouched organ works of the Lynar B3 tablature and their context in the history of the North German Præambulum

2011· dissertation· en· W7071869874 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusicology and Musical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Music Media and Technology
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsGermanContext (archaeology)NotationFunction (biology)Quality (philosophy)Subject (documents)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lynar manuscripts represent one of the largest collections of North German organ music.The Lynar B collection includes a sizeable number of anonymous works that have never been published.This study thus constitutes the first publication of a transcription from the historical tablature into modern notation of all the anonymous praeludia/praeambula from the Lynar B3 fascicle.Furthermore, the study situates these pieces within the history of the North German praeambulum by way of a systematic survey into the function of organ music in the Lutheran mass and the role of improvisation, the influence of the fantasia on the praeludium, the tablature system, and the history and content of the Lynar B3 manuscript itself.This study offers a thematic catalogue of the incipits of the pieces with information on their length, tonality, and formal outline.The collection is not of uniformly high quality comparable with the oeuvre of Sweelinck or other major composers, but provides a highly stimulating insight into the workshop of a seventeenth-century organist, and completes our understanding of a major historical resource.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicMusicology and Musical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207