The untouched organ works of the Lynar B3 tablature and their context in the history of the North German Præambulum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les manuscrits Lynar représentent une des collections plus vastes de musiqued‘orgue d‘Allemagne du Nord. La collection Lynar B3 comprend un nombreconsidérable d‘oeuvres anonymes qui ne furent jamais publiées. Cette étudeconstitue donc la première publication d‘une transcription de cette tabulaturehistorique en notation moderne de tous les praeludia/praeambula anonymes dufascicule Lynar B3. En outre, l‘étude replace ces pièces dans l‘histoire dupraeambulum d‘Allemagne du Nord dans une perspective synoptique du rôle de lamusique d‘orgue à l‘intérieur de la messe luthérienne, de celui de l‘improvisation,de l‘influence de la fantasia sur le praeludium, du système de tabulature, et del‘histoire et du contenu du manuscrit Lynar B3 même. Cette étude propose uncatalogue thématique des incipits de toutes les pièces avec informations sur lesdurées, les tonalités, et les considérations formelles. Si la collection ne dénote pasune qualité uniformement élevée comparable à l‘oeuvre de Sweelinck ou celled‘autres éminents compositeurs, elle offre néanmoins un aperçu très stimulant del‘atelier d‘un organiste du XVIIème siècle, et ajoute à notre compréhension d‘uneressource historique significative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".