MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7071962655

In-Vehicle Safety Features and Their Impacts on Fatal Crashes

2023· dissertation· en· W7071962655 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Work (physics)LimitingPretextReliability (semiconductor)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most important safety metrics in transportation engineering is fatal crashes, and a major effect to improve safety is to reduce fatal crashes. Therefore, safety features are continuously tested and equipped in vehicles to reduce fatal crashes and provide safety to road users. This study was initiated to explore the relationship between two in-vehicle safety features and their impact on fatal crashes. These two in-vehicle safety features are the Lane Keep Assist System (LKAS) and the Forward Collision Warning System (FCWS). This thesis analyzed nine different General Motors (GM) vehicles’ make, model, and year to test which in-vehicle safety feature reduced fatal crashes. To test the LKAS safety feature, run-off-road fatal crashes were analyzed using the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) data for the Chevrolet Silverado, the Chevrolet Equinox, the GMC Yukon, the GMC Sierra, and the Cadillac Escalade model vehicles. To test the FCWS safety feature, rear-end fatal crashes were analyzed using FARS data for the Chevrolet Equinox, the Chevrolet Traverse, the Buick Enclave, the GMC Acadia, and the GMC Terrain. The odds ratios for the LKAS safety feature for the Chevrolet Silverado, the Chevrolet Equinox, the GMC Sierra, the GMC Yukon, and the Cadillac Escalade model vehicles were 0.704, 0.615, 0.601, 0.446, and 1.149, respectively. The odds ratio showed, when examining the LKAS safety feature for the Chevrolet Silverado, the Chevrolet Equinox, the GMC Yukon, the GMC Sierra, and the Cadillac Escalade model vehicles, that four of the five vehicle models examined resulted in reductions in run-off-road fatal crashes; the GMC Yukon was not statistically significant in reducing this type of crashes. Additionally, the odds ratios for the FCWS safety feature for the Chevrolet Equinox, the GMC Terrain, the Chevrolet Traverse, the GMC Acadia, and the Buick Enclave model vehicles were 0.814, 0.199, 0.873, 0.638, and 0.143, respectively. The odds ratio showed, when examining the FCWS safety feature for the Chevrolet Equinox, the Chevrolet Traverse, the Buick Enclave, the GMC Acadia, and the GMC Terrain model vehicles, that four of the five vehicles examined resulted in a reduction in rear-end crashes; the Chevrolet Equinox, the Chevrolet Traverse, and the GMC Acadia were not statistically significant in reducing run-off-road fatal crashes. In addition, the GMC Terrain results were undefined. Key Words: Lane Keep Assist System (LKAS), Forward Collision Warning (FCWS), fatal crashes, and General Motors (GM)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas)Same topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207