MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7071964905

Vessel: stories from the edge of the world

2023· dissertation· en· W7071964905 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilmmakingObject (grammar)Identity (music)Documentary filmEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionExpression (computer science)Narrative
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the first instances of human inhabitation on the island of Newfoundland, \nwooden boats have been crucial facilitators to life on The Rock. Those who called \nthis beautifully rugged land home were able to do so as a direct result of hand built \nwooden watercraft, fashioned from the land and made for the purpose of \nexisting on the sea. Today, wooden boats have long since given way to the pressures \nof the industrial age, yet a select few people continue to practice this tradition of \nboat building for both personal, practical, and heritage preservation reasons. As \nan object of material culture, wooden boat building is argued to represent an act \nof placemaking, intertwining the collective identity of communities with the individual \nidentity of boat builders. \n \nExploratory filmmaking practice and interviews with Newfoundlanders involved \nin boat building traditions reflect and refract the socio-cultural conditions that \ncharacterize the place. A documentary film is made to express the synergetic \nrelationship between wooden boats, the landscape, and the culture surrounding it. \nUltimately, the film is a vessel for the ineffable experiences of Newfoundland as a \ntrue expression of place.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.005
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→