MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7072088574

Trophic transfer and spatial distribution of mercury in the Gulf of St. Lawrence using northern gannets «Morus bassanus» as biological samplers

2023· dissertation· en· W7072088574 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicConservation Techniques and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
KeywordsMercury (programming language)Trophic levelSpatial distributionSpatial variabilitySpatial ecology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contaminants are ubiquitous in marine environments, but they are not evenly distributed.Organisms at varying trophic levels and habitats are exposed to different contaminant loads due to biomagnification through food webs and spatial heterogeneity.This thesis seeks to understand how mercury, a contaminant of high concern for wildlife due to its neurotoxic properties, moves through the food web up to a top predator, the northern gannet (Morus bassanus) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, and how different foraging habitats may influence the mercury loads in their prey.Chapter 1 reviews the current literature pertaining to mercury, the use of stable isotopes in ecotoxicology and the use of seabirds as ecological indicators.Chapter 2 compares the use of two stable isotope analysis methods to evaluate the rate of mercury biomagnification in the northern gannet food web.Compound-specific stable isotope analysis of amino acids (CSIA-AA) provides a method to estimate baseline stable nitrogen isotope values of food webs.The method allows less biased estimates of trophic positions than those provided by bulk stable isotope analysis, improving estimates of contaminant biomagnification.I calculated trophic positions with published CSIA-AA equations for four species of fish and for northern gannets and examined the effect of CSIA-AA-derived trophic positions on biomagnification metrics for mercury and compared to the more traditional bulk stable isotope approach.Trophic magnification factors (TMFs) produced by CSIA-AA were lower than that produced by bulk stable isotope analysis.The bulk technique yielded one of the highest TMFs ever reported in the scientific literature.My work demonstrates discrepancies in biomagnification assessed using different approaches that may go undetected when using a single approach.Chapter 3 seeks to understand how different foraging habitats may determine the contaminant load contained in gannets' diet, and what anthropogenic and biotic factors drive mercury contamination in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.To map the chemical landscape of mercury, I collected fish regurgitations from GPS-tracked northern gannets.I assigned mercury concentrations from fish muscle to the last known gannet foraging location, classified using Hidden Markov Models.In small fish species, trophic positions calculated with CSIA-AA values were the best predictor of THg.THg in large fish species was best explained by stable carbon isotopes, indicating inshore habitats had higher THg contamination than pelagic ones.Demonstrating where contaminants accumulate more efficiently is crucial to understanding what risks wildlife are exposed to based on their habitat and feeding ecology.The thesis develops novel tools for measuring contamination in our increasingly polluted oceans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicConservation Techniques and StudiesFrench-language works237,207