Un protector laminado de brazo (<i>manica</i>) procedente del campamento de la <i>legio VII Gemina</i> en León
Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the archaeological excavations carried out during 1998 in Santa Marina street, near the internal face of the Late Roman wall of Leon, an important building of the legio VII gemina fortress was discovered. It was identified as a magazine with a central courtyard, erected by this legionary unit at the end of the 1st c. AD. Inside one of the constructions a fragment of a manica or a laminated arm protector was found. \nThis element consists of 11 overlapping plates of different sizes, four of them trapezoid and seven rectangular and of greater size. Some fragments were preserved, which could have been leather. This ensemble became deformed by crushing. This protector was abandoned around the last quarter of the 3rd c. AD in a room which was possibly a storage area and was crushed by the collapse of the roof of the building. Las excavaciones arqueológicas desarrolladas durante 1998 en un solar de la calle Santa Marina, inmediato a la cara interna de la muralla bajoimperial de León, revelaron un gran edificio perteneciente al campamento de la legio VII gemina, que ha sido identificado como un almacén con patio central, levantado a finales del siglo I d. C. En el interior de una de las estancias se encontró un fragmento de manica o protector laminado de brazo. \nEste elemento está constituido por 11 láminas imbricadas de distinto tamaño, cuatro trapezoidales y siete rectangulares de mayor tamaño. Se conservan algunos restos de lo que pudiera ser cuero. Este conjunto se encuentra deformado por aplastamiento. El protector fue abandonado hacia el último cuarto del siglo III d. C. en una estancia destinada posiblemente a almacenamiento y quedó aplastado por el derrumbe del techo del edificio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".