Welcome, young entrepeneurs!: Discursos sobre o empreendedorismo em coleções didáticas de língua inglesa do novo ensino médio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present article analyzes discourses on entrepreneurship in two didactic textbooks of the English Language approved in the Programa Nacional do Livro e do Material Didático (PNLD), 2021 edition – a governmental and educational Brazilian regulatory agency, in line with the Reform of New High School (BRASIL, 2017). The objective of the study is to relate discourses about entrepreneurship in the aforementioned teaching material with the intentions of neoliberal rationality in the field of education and, more specifically, in the teaching of English as a foreign language. Support is sought, especially, in Foucault (2008; 2010), and Dardot and Laval (2016). This is a descriptive-interpretive and documentary work of a qualitative nature. The discourses on entrepreneurship in the studied books are stained by neoliberal rationality, once they celebrate the entrepreneurial subject as a successful model to be followed by students and strengthen the idea that learning the English language represents an investment in the competitive market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".