MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7072252018

Women's Consultation in Constructive Theology

2013· article· en· W7072252018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America (Catholic Theological Society of America) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTheological Perspectives and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstructiveInterpretation (philosophy)Presentational and representational actingContext (archaeology)Agency (philosophy)Presentation (obstetrics)Mediation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roll's presentation on "Women and Prophetic Sacramentality" was structured around a sequence of thought-provoking questions.These questions were posed to the audience in the context of the presentation, and audience members were later invited to refl ect on them in small groups.Roll began her presentation with a question concerning women's agency and personhood.She illustrated this question with reference to Canada's "Famous Five," a group of women who, in the late 1920s, fought the prevailing interpretation of the Canadian Constitution that excluded women under the claim that "only persons can be appointed to the Senate."After the activists won legal recognition that women were indeed persons, a woman was appointed to the Canadian Senate in 1929.After examining the implications of the "death of the subject," personalism, and difference, for agency, Roll concluded by asking, "What form might women's agency take in discourse on sacraments?"In her second question, Roll addressed the signifi cance of sacramental mediation in the current Western cultural context of "im-mediate gratifi cation."Suggesting that the immediacy of online interaction has shaped the Western perception of reality, Roll argued that in online interaction, persons are "absorbed" into what they are doing.Person and machine are integrated.Such an integration raises the question of the place of mediatory actions in the sacraments in a world in which im-mediacy is more and more frequently the norm.Turning to the explicitly ecclesial context, Roll addressed the signifi cance of Church authority in the sacraments.Citing the phenomena of "Kitchen Table Eucharists," non-sacramental anointing of the sick, and Sunday Celebrations in the Absence of a Priest, Roll questioned whether the immediacy of experience in these sorts of celebrations trivializes the sacrament or reduces its universality.Given the metaphors of our own time and the traditional belief that God works through the sacraments, but is not bound by them, Roll suggested that the criteria of matter and form, and validity and liceity, might profi tably be considered through the lens of energy.She asked, "How can we theologize about sacraments as energy?"In the fi nal portion of her formal presentation, Roll examined the signifi cance of women's bodies through the lens of the historical development of rituals for the Churching of Women after Childbirth (none of which are currently approved for use).Beginning with Hippolytus, whose rite calls for new mothers and midwives to be grouped with the catechumens, Roll questioned whether these rituals had historically acted to suspend the baptisms of women for several weeks after the birth of a child.Here she posed the question of the signifi cance of gender for the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.027
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it