MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7072321537

Wicket gate lever redesign

2012· other· en· W7072321537 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQR Code Applications and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersManitoba Hydro
KeywordsLeverTroubleshootingStrain gaugeStress (linguistics)Fatigue testing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this report is to provide analysis and redesign details on a mechanical component which our client, Manitoba Hydro, has noted are prone to failure. The component in question, a wicket gate lever, serves as a linkage that controls the flow of water in a hydroelectric generating station. After roughly forty years of operation, large cracks have developed in these components. Manitoba Hydro requires a new lever design which will not crack and will remain serviceable until the station is decommissioned. Strain gauges placed on the wicket gate lever and surrounding components show that the stress at the crack location does not exceed 2.6 ksi. This is in reasonably close agreement with the finite element analysis and hand calculations performed on the part, which evaluated the stress at the crack location as 2.1 ksi and 2.7 ksi respectively. All of these stresses are well below the estimated endurance strength of 8.16 ksi for the ASTM A27 steel used in the wicket gate’s construction, which should indicate an infinite fatigue life of the part. After performing the above analysis and examining the wicket gate levers, our team has determined that the failure of the wicket gate levers cannot be due to excessive stress, and the only other reasonable cause of failure is poor material quality and casting. Surface defects, large deviations in the as-cast part, and large voids would aid in crack initiation and propagation in the wicket gate levers. These flaws are therefore the only plausible cause of failure. In order to rectify these problems, the material, manufacturing process, and geometry of the part have been changed. Cold wrought ASTM A36 plate steel will be used in order to facilitate the machining and welding processes to create part. Geometric changes have been made to reduce stress concentrations and provide weld surfaces. The machining process will provide a smooth surface finish, allow for very consistent and precise geometry, and eliminate any voids which would occur during the casting process. Since the strain gauge analysis indicates low stress levels throughout the wicket gate lever relative to the yield stress, and since the new design improves upon the material qualities, cracking will not occur in the part. Overall, the new wicket gate lever is expected to remain in service after it is built, and will last until the station is decommissioned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it