MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7072334306

Winter ecology of Sandhill Cranes (Grus canadensis ) in northern Mexico

2013· article· en· W7072334306 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLincoln (University of Nebraska) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSandhillPopulationHabitatWildlifeHerbivoreBrackish water
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sandhill Cranes (Grus canadensis) are a widespread species in North America and one of the most studied cranes in the world. However, most of the research has focused on the breeding grounds of Canada and Alaska and the staging grounds of Nebraska. Although an important proportion of the Mid-continent Population of Sandhill Cranes winters in northern Mexico, little information exists on distribution, status, and ecology of the species in Mexico. The goal of this dissertation was to provide new information on Sandhill Crane winter ecology from a regional perspective to better understand population trends. I examined the physiological state of Sandhill Cranes in wild conditions by quantifying the effects of environmental factors on stress levels. My data suggests that access to water resources is the main factor affecting corticosterone levels of cranes. I validated a method to measure glucocorticoid metabolites in fecal samples using an affordable and commercially available enzyme immunoassay. I demonstrated that the use of an enzyme immunoassay provides accurate measurements of steroid metabolite concentrations comparable to the traditional radioimmunoassay. I examined winter diet of Sandhill Cranes and investigated if the species exhibits a specialized or generalized diet in Mexico. I also explored the ecological response of the species to low food availability conditions. According to my results, cranes exhibit a specialized diet of corn during winter as patterns of consumption did not vary with corn availability. Cranes responded to low food availability by moving geographically to a location where corn was available instead of shifting diets. Finally, I included a human dimensions perspective to document the attitudes of rural inhabitants towards Sandhill Cranes. I investigated if crop consumption by cranes represented a problem for Mexican farmers in the wintering grounds. The results of my interviews indicate that Mexican farmers are not affected by the arrival of cranes and do not consider the species to be a problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLincoln (University of Nebraska)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207