Генеративное развитие видов рода Pinus L., интродуцированных в Донецком ботаническом саду НАН Украины
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The results of the ten-year studies of 26 Pinus L. species and forms, introduced in the Donetsk Botanical Gardens, Nat. Acad. Sci. of Ukraine are presented. The level of generative development of the species, the specific features of morphogenesis in generative buds, anomalous pollen grains, the viability of the pollen of the species under investigation were determined. It was noted that the high percentage of viable pollen is characteristic of the species originating from the Canadian, Central European, Eastern European provinces of the Circumboreal floristic region, province of the Atlantic Lowlands of the Atlantic-North American region, province of the Rocky Mountains of the Rocky Mountain region, and the Crimean-and-Novorossyisk province of the Mediterannean floristic region. The conclusion was made that 11 Pinus species have good prospects for their seed propagation in the south-east of Ukraine with view of their wide use in the urban greening and forestry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".