Нове Законодавство України про Національну поліцію і поліцейську діяльність. Яким йому бути?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статті системно розкривається історіографія створення кодексів як в Україні, так і в інших країнах світу, а також наголошується на тому, що реформа системи органів правопорядку в Україні повинна отримати ефективне законодавче оформлення не в звичайному законі, а в Поліцейському кодексі України. Концептуальні засади реформування системи правоохоронних органів повинні виходити з того, що співробітники поліції є безпосереднім обличчям держави; необхідно прагнути закласти в законодавство такі світоглядні правові підвалини, які б сприяли формуванню високого рівня довіри громадян до поліції. Також потрібно зробити процес проходження служби поліцейського та його кар’єрного зростання прозорим і об’єктивним. \n The article deals with the historiography of establishing Codes both in Ukraine and other countries of the world which is revealed systematically in the article. The author lays emphasis on the necessity to create Police сode of Ukraine that could provide effective legislative support for the law enforcement authorities in the course of reforming the existing system. Conceptual principle of the system reforming process implies security guarantees to the citizens, society, state, security against threats, challenges and dangers. The basic idea of the reform is to make the police staff a decent face of the state. The author suggests that radical legislative reformation changes of the police forces imply radical modification of the legal foundations of the laws which would facilitate formation of the public confidence in the police like in Georgia, Canada, Norway, Germany, the USA, Finland, Japan and other countries of the world. It is necessary to make career development of the policemen transparent and objective on the basis of just evaluation of the results of their work and thus guarantee them perspectives to be promoted owing to personal qualities and professional achievements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".