MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7073608476

La tradición de los Movimientos de Renovación Pedagógica en los Comunes Educativos: un estudio de casos

2023· article· zh· W7073608476 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodTSG101DysgeusiaDiafiltrationLiquationEmperipolesisTriacetinDemotion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本文拟阐明教育公地(EC)提案与 "教学革新运动"(MRP)方法之间的关系。教育公地是一种基于公地的理论-实践方法(Ostrom, 1990; Laval and Dardot, 2015)的教学方法,它渴望打破制度化教育行为中的权力关系,将教育实践理解为在平等、民主、自由和积极的创造性参与原则基础上生产、再生产和共同管理的共同利益。MRPs 则起源于西班牙政治过渡时期和民主初期的教育变革,涉及基于批判教育学和民主承诺原则的社区动员行动的组织和实施(Rogero,2010 年)。我们的研究以 "欧洲畅通 "项目为框架,以将欧洲委员会的理念付诸实践的一系列研讨会的案例研究为基础。具体地说,在这项工作中,我们围绕三个轴心确定了与 MRPs 建立的可能对话和协同作用:治理、参与和来自艺术实践的公共空间行动。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.098

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0100.018
Scholarly communication0.0180.013
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber OpticsFrench-language works237,207