Nuevas aportaciones al estudio del recinto de la judería de Valencia delimitado en 1244
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1244 King James I of Aragon determined the area of the Jewish Quarter of Valencia making reference to five points of the city of which, until now, only the exact location of the Xerea Gate was known. The analysis of the bordering properties with milestones in the lists of the Records I and III of the Llibre del Repartiment has allowed us to determine the location of the other four points, making it possible to verify that Amnalmelig’s baths were to the south of the Jewish Quarter, contrary to current opinion. The results of the research have been captured on plans that reconstruct the urban planning of the epoch, based on the most ancient cartography of the city (the plans of Mancelli [1608] and Tosca [1704]), on archaeological reports and on the remains of streets that were abolished to form part of private properties. A raíz de la conquista de la ciudad, el rey Jaime I delimita en 1244 en Valencia un espacio para los judíos. Con esta finalidad, hace referencia a cinco puntos de los que, hasta el momento, solo se conocía la ubicación exacta de la puerta de la Xerea. El análisis de las propiedades limítrofes con estos hitos en los listados de los registros I y III del Llibre del Repartiment ha permitido determinar la ubicación de los otros cuatro puntos, pudiendo comprobar que los baños de Amnalmelig se encontraban al sur del barrio judío contrariamente a lo que, hasta ahora, se había pensado. Los resultados de la investigación se han plasmado sobre planos actuales, reconstruyendo el urbanismo de la época basándose en la cartografía más antigua de la ciudad (Mancelli [1608] y Tosca [1704]), en informes arqueológicos y en los vestigios de calles actualmente desaparecidas que han pasado a formar parte de propiedades privadas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".