MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7073641080

The effects of drought on Sphagnum moss species and the implications for hydrology in peatlands

2025· article· en· W7073641080 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuee-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSphagnumPeatEcosystemEcohydrologyBogMossClimate changeWetlandKeystone species
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peatlands store more carbon (C) than any other terrestrial ecosystem and as a C sink they are vital to mitigating climate change. The keystone of many peatland ecosystems is Sphagnum, a bryophyte genus of c. 350 species found on every continent except Antarctica. With climate change, many peatlands face increasing frequency and severity of drought. How Sphagnum responds to and recovers from drought will be key to sustaining peatlands over the coming decades. Here, we synthesise the latest evidence for how interactions of drought with Sphagnum affect peatland functioning. We discuss how Sphagnum traits, from the cellular to the community, control its ecohydrology and what changes occur during drought. We detail the effects of drought on Sphagnum C cycling and biochemistry, including photosynthesis, growth, respiration and methane (CH4) fluxes. We also highlight drought resilience and tipping points for Sphagnum physiology and at the ecosystem level. The implications of Sphagnum drought responses for peatland hydrology, restoration and wildfires are also outlined. Finally, we identify knowledge gaps and propose some urgent questions which should be addressed in future research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-space (Manchester Metropolitan University)Same topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207