MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7073785458

Frequency and Longitudinal Course of Behavioral and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Participants With Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia.

2024· article· en· W7073785458 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDZNE Pub · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJanssen PharmaceuticalsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWeston Brain InstituteJunta de AndalucíaEisaiMinistero della SaluteBayer VitalDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreEuropean CommissionIonis PharmaceuticalsMedical Research CouncilBiogen
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaC9orf72DementiaFrontotemporal lobar degenerationAtrophyCohortPsychosis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms are frequent in patients with genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We aimed to describe behavioral and neuropsychiatric phenotypes in genetic FTD, quantify their temporal association, and investigate their regional association with brain atrophy.We analyzed data of pathogenic variant carriers in the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (c9orf72), progranulin (GRN), or microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene from the Genetic Frontotemporal dementia Initiative cohort study that enrolls both symptomatic pathogenic variant carriers and first-degree relatives of known carriers. Principal component analysis was performed to identify behavioral and neuropsychiatric clusters that were compared with respect to frequency and severity between groups. Associations between neuropsychiatric clusters and MRI-assessed atrophy were determined using voxel-based morphometry. We applied linear mixed effects and generalized linear mixed effects models to assess the longitudinal course of symptoms.A total of 522 participants were included: 221 c9orf72 (138 presymptomatic), 213 GRN (157 presymptomatic), and 88 MAPT (62 presymptomatic) pathogenic variant carriers. Principal component analysis revealed 5 phenotypic clusters (67.6% of variance), labeled diverse behavioral, affective, psychotic, euphoric/hypersexual, and tactile hallucinations phenotype. In participants presenting behavioral or neuropsychiatric symptoms, affective symptoms were most frequent across groups (83.6%-88.1%), followed by diverse behavioral symptoms (68.4%-77.9%). In c9orf72 and GRN pathogenic variant carriers, psychotic symptoms (32.0% and 19.4%, respectively) were more frequent than euphoric/hypersexual symptoms (28.7% and 14.2%, respectively), which was the other way around in MAPT pathogenic variant carriers (28.6% and 23.8%). Although diverse behavioral symptoms were associated with gray and white matter frontotemporal atrophy, only a small atrophy cluster in the right thalamus was associated with psychotic symptoms. Euphoric/hypersexual symptoms were associated with atrophy in mesial temporal lobes, basal forebrain structures, and the striatum (p < 0.05). Estimated time to symptom onset, genetic group, education, and sex influenced behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms (p < 0.05). Particularly, in c9orf72 pathogenic variant carriers, psychotic symptoms may be starting decades before recognition of onset of illness.We identified multiple clusters of behavioral and neuropsychiatric symptoms in participants with genetic FTD that relate to distinct cerebral atrophy patterns. Their severity depends on time, affected gene, sex, and education. These clinical-genetic associations can guide diagnostic evaluations and the design of clinical trials for new disease-modifying and preventive treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDZNE PubSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207