MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7073836351

Population-based surveillance of invasive group A streptococcal disease in British Columbia: 1996 to 1998

2001· article· en· W7073836351 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCase fatality rateIncidence (geometry)PopulationMortality rateSkin infectionDrug injectionDiseaseEpidemiologyDisease surveillance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe all cases of invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) infection occurring in British Columbia during a two-year period. DESIGN: Active, laboratory-based surveillance with supplemental case description. SETTING: Forty community and regional hospitals and the provincial laboratory participated, encompassing all health regions. POPULATION STUDIED: Entire provincial population from April 1, 1996 to March 31, 1998. MAIN RESULTS: Over the 24-month surveillance period, 182 eligible cases were identified, yielding a mean annual incidence rate of 2.3/100,000. Patients ranged in age from two to 91 years, with a mean of 39.1 years. Soft tissue infections accounted for 89 of 130 cases (68.5%) with a defined clinical syndrome, 20 of which were necrotizing fasciitis. Injection drug use was described in 55 patients, who, as a group, were younger, more likely to have soft tissue infections and less likely to die of infection than nondrug users. Other risk factors for infection included HIV infection (19 patients); skin damage (26 patients, damage independent of injection drug use); chronic illness (27 patients); and immunosuppresion (three patients). Death from GAS infection occurred in 15 of 131 (11.5%) cases with known outcome, yielding an annual case fatality rate of 1.9/million population. Among necrotizing faciitis cases, the mortality rate was 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive GAS infections are rare in British Columbia and tend to involve persons with chronic illness or prior skin trauma, especially injection drug abuse, which accounted for nearly half of the cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed CentralSame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207