MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7073926099

The Learning Curve and Annual Procedure Volume Standards for Optimum Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Findings from an International Registry

2018· dissertation· W7073926099 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2018
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades CardiovascularesUniversité Paris DiderotUniversité LavalUniversità di CataniaUniversidad de MálagaSociedade Beneficente Israelita Brasileira Albert Einstein
KeywordsValve replacementLearning curveVolume (thermodynamics)Ventricular volumeAortic valveCardiac catheterization
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a technically complex procedure. Despite increasing use of TAVR across institutions, incomplete knowledge exists to describe the learning curve and minimum annual volumes for this procedure. We hypothesize that TAVR has a prolonged learning curve, as well as a high minimal annual volume to maintain competency. In this study, we analyzed data from 16 international centers comprising 3403 patients from the inception of their TAVR programs. The study identified an important learning curve, with higher mortality for the first 225 cases compared to those performed after > 300 case volume, and higher combined major complications up until a 300-case volume. In addition, the 30-day mortality was higher for centers performing

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207