Automatic segmentation of the brain and intracranial cerebrospinal fluid in t(1)-weighted volume MRI scans of the head, and its application to serial cerebral and intracranial volumetry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new fully automatic algorithm for the segmentation of the brain and total intracranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from T-1-weighted volume MRI scans of the head, called Exbrain v.2, is described. The algorithm was developed in the context of serial intracranial volumetry. A brain mask obtained using a previous version of the algorithm forms the basis of the CSF segmentation. Improved brain segmentation is then obtained by iterative tracking of the brain-CSF interface. Gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and intracranial CSF volumes and probability maps are calculated based on a model of intensity probability distribution (IPD) that includes two partial volume classes: GM-CSF and GM-WM. Accuracy was assessed using the Montreal Neurological Institute's (MNI) digital phantom scan. Reproducibility was assessed using scan pairs from 24 controls and 10 patients with epilepsy. Segmentation overlap with the gold standard was 98% for the brain and 95%, 96%, and 97% for the GM, WM, and total intracranial contents, respectively; CSF overlap was 86%. In the controls, the Bland and Altman coefficient of reliability (CR) was 35.2 cm(3) for the total brain volume (TBV) and 29.0 cm(3) for the intracranial volume (ICV). Scan-matching reduced CR to 25.2 cm(3) and 17.1 cm(3) for the TBV and ICV, respectively. For the patients, similar CR values were obtained for the ICV. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".