Elucidating the major hidden genomic components of the A, C, and AC genomes and their influence on Brassica evolution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decoding complete genome sequences is prerequisite for comprehensive genomics studies. However, the currently available reference genome sequences of Brassica rapa (A genome), B. oleracea (C) and B. napus (AC) cover 391, 540, and 850 Mbp and represent 80.6, 85.7, and 75.2% of the estimated genome size, respectively, while remained are hidden or unassembled due to highly repetitive nature of these genome components. Here, we performed the first comprehensive genome-wide analysis using low-coverage whole-genome sequences to explore the hidden genome components based on characterization of major repeat families in the B. rapa and B. oleracea genomes. Our analysis revealed 10 major repeats (MRs) including a new family comprising about 18.8, 10.8, and 11.5% of the A, C and AC genomes, respectively. Nevertheless, these 10 MRs represented less than 0.7% of each assembled reference genome. Genomic survey and molecular cytogenetic analyses validates our insilico analysis and also pointed to diversity, differential distribution, and evolutionary dynamics in the three Brassica species. Overall, our work elucidates hidden portions of three Brassica genomes, thus providing a resource for understanding the complete genome structures. Furthermore, we observed that asymmetrical accumulation of the major repeats might be a cause of diversification between the A and C genomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".