MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7074061075

Separating Birth from Community: Colonialism and Historical Institutionalism in Indigenous Pregnancy Evacuation Policies

2024· article· en· W7074061075 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousColonialismNorm (philosophy)Health careMaternity care
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Evacuating pregnant Indigenous individuals who live in remote communities to urban centres for birthing is not a formal or written policy in Canada, but has been the norm for several decades. Canada is a geographically large country with remote communities, often inhabited by Indigenous peoples, which provides universal health care to communities spanning from the Pacific to Atlantic oceans. The evacuation of pregnant Indigenous peoples has resulted in a disconnection between birth and community, land, ceremony, and Traditional Healing. This policy displacing pregnant Indigenous women has been reportedto bring them emotional, financial, and physical harm. Historical institutionalism may be precluding significant change to the norm of maternal evacuation. Euro-Canadian epistemologies and colonial mindsets have prevented biomedical institutions from seeing the detachment from land and community as a problem, as the transfer to tertiary hospitals may have been considered beneficial for Indigenous women. Indigenous self-determination in reforming Indigenous maternity care policies is crucial in addressing this health systems issue. L’évacuation des personnes enceintes autochtones vivant en communautés isolées vers des centres urbains pour y accoucher n’est pas une politique officielle, ni écrite, au Canada, mais la norme existe depuis plusieurs dizaines d’années. Le Canada est un pays géographiquement vaste comptant de nombreuses communautés isolées, souvent habitées par des personnes autochtones, et fournissant des soins de santé universels aux communautés qui s’étendent de l’océan Pacifique à l’océan Atlantique. L’évacuation des personnes enceintes autochtones a entraîné une déconnexion entre la naissance et la communauté, la terre, les cérémonies et la guérison traditionnelle. Cette politique de déplacement des femmes enceintes autochtones leur causent des effets néfastes émotionnels, financiers et physiques. L’institutionnalisme historique peut empêcher un changement significatif de la norme d’évacuation des mères. Les épistémologies euro-canadiennes et les mentalités coloniales ont empêché les institutions biomédicales de considérer le détachement de la terre et de la communauté comme un problème, car le transfert vers des hôpitaux tertiaires a pu être considéré comme bénéfique pour les femmes autochtones. L’autodétermination autochtone par rapport à la réforme des politiques de soins obstétricaux chez les personnes autochtones est cruciale pour résoudre ce problème de systèmes de santé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.040
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.481
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207