Inequality of Opportunity for Education : The Case of Turkey
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper seeks to measure inequality \n of opportunity for education in turkey, taking into account \n both the quantity (attainment) and the quality of schooling \n (achievement). Using DHS data, large gaps in age-enrollment \n profiles are documented across genders, regions, and family \n backgrounds. The gender gap is particularly pronounced in \n the Easter provinces, in rural areas, and for poorer and \n larger households. PISA data show that morally irrelevant \n circumstances also affect achievement. The lower bound for \n the share of the variance in test scores that is accounted \n for by such circumstances in between a quarter and a third, \n depending on the subject and on the procedure adopted to \n correct for sample selection. Among those circumstances, \n family background variables such as parental education, \n father's occupation and the ownership of books, \n cultural possessions and electronics, seem to account for \n the largest inequality shares. Once the composition of \n families is controlled for, spatial location is considerably \n less important.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it