A framework for assessing off-stream freshwater use in LCA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose Freshwater scarcity is a problem in many areas of \nthe world and will become one of the most sensitive \nenvironmental issues in coming decades. Existing life cycle \nassessment (LCA) methodologies generally do not provide \nassessment schemes or characterization factors of the \npotential environmental impacts of freshwater use or \nfreshwater resource depletion. These assessments therefore \ndo not account for the significant environmental consequences of the loss in quality and availability of freshwater. \nThis paper aims to develop a framework to address this \nmethodological limitation and to support further quantitative modeling of the cause–effect chain relationships of \nwater use. The framework includes recommendations for \nlife cycle inventory (LCI) modeling and provides a \ndescription of possible impact pathways for life cycle \nimpact assessment (LCIA), including indicators on midpoint and endpoint levels that reflect different areas of \nprotection (AoP). \nMethodology LCI of freshwater use aims to quantify \nchanges in freshwater availability. The key elements \naffected by changes in availability are sufficient freshwater \nsupplies for contemporary human users, ecosystems, and \nfuture generations, the latter referring to the renewability of \nthe resource. Three midpoint categories are therefore \nproposed and linked to common AoP as applied in LCIA. \nResults and discussion We defined a set of water types, \neach representing an elementary flow. Water balances for \neach type allows the quantification of changes in freshwater \navailability. These values are recommended as results for \nthe LCI of water use. Insufficient freshwater supplies for \ncontemporary human users can mean freshwater deficits \nfor human uses, which is the first midpoint impact category \nultimately affecting the AoP of human life; freshwater \ndeficits in ecosystems is the second proposed midpoint \nimpact category and is linked to the AoP biotic environment. Finally, the last midpoint category is freshwater \ndepletion caused by intensive overuse that exceeds the \nregeneration rate, which itself is ultimately linked to the \nAoP abiotic environment. Depending on the regional \ncontext, the development of scenarios aimed to compensate \nfor the lack of water for specific uses by using backup \ntechnologies (e.g., saltwater treatment, the import of \nagricultural goods) can avoid generating direct impacts on \nthe midpoint impact category freshwater deficits for human \nuses. Indirect impacts must be assessed through an \nextension of system boundaries including these backup \ntechnologies. Because freshwater is a resource with high \nspatial and temporal variability, the proposed framework \ndiscusses aspects of regionalization in relationship to data \navailability, appropriate spatial and temporal resolution, and \nsoftware capacities to support calculations. \nConclusions The framework provides recommendations for \nthe development of operational LCA methods for water \nResponsible editor: Llorenç Milà i Canals \nJ.-B. Bayart (*) : F. Vince \nVeolia Environment Recherche et Innovation, \n10 rue Jacques Daguerre, \n92500 Rueil-Malmaison, France \ne-mail: jean-baptiste.bayart@veolia.com \nC. Bulle : L. Deschênes: M. Margni \nCIRAIG, Chemical Engineering Department, \nÉcole Polytechnique de Montréal, \nP.O. Box 6079, Montréal, Québec H3C 3A7, Canada \nS. Pfister : A. Koehler \nInstitute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zurich, \nETH Hoenggerberg, \n8093 Zurich, Switzerland \nInt J Life Cycle Assess (2010) 15:439–453 \nDOI 10.1007/s11367-010-0172-7 \nuse. It establishes the link between LCI and LCIA, wateruse mechanism models, and impact pathways to environmental damages in a consistent way. \nRecommendations Based on this framework, next steps \nconsist of the development of operational methods for both \ninventory modeling and impact assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".