MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7074156332

Experimental Test of Time Dilation by Laser Spectroscopy on Fast Ions

2006· book-chapter· en· W7074156332 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMax Planck Digital Library · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime dilationDoppler effectSign (mathematics)InterferometryWavelengthDilation (metric space)Theory of relativityPerpendicularEinstein
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ives-Stilwell experiment – measuring the time dilation relation γSR = (1 – β 2)–½ – is one of the three classic experiments to test Special Relativity. Together with the interferometric tests of the velocity-independence as well as the isotropy of the speed of light, governed by the Michelson-Morley and the Kennedy-Thorndike experiment, respectively, the Ives-Stilwell experiment entirely establishes Special Relativity on an experimental basis and replaces Einsteins postulates [1]. While the interferometric experiments are ‘nullexperiments’ looking for deviations of the constancy of the speed of light, the time dilation test provides a positive measurement based on a Lorentz boost. It was Einstein who proposed already in 1907 to look for the time dilation effect by observing the Doppler-shifted wavelength of light emitted by excited fast atoms perpendicularly to the motion. In this direction, the classical Doppler effect vanishes leaving pure time dilation. However, it turned out that this scheme is difficult to implement as already small deviations of the observation angle from 90 degree would cause frequency shifts due to the classical Doppler effect which varies linearly around π/2. It took another 31 years until Ives and Stilwell performed the first measurement. Contrary to Einsteins idea they observed the Doppler shifts not perpendicularly but in forward and in backward direction of the atomic motion. This scheme provides different advantages. First, the classical Doppler shift vanishes in this scheme because it is of equal magnitude but opposite in sign in both directions of observation. Secondly, the measurement is less sensitive to small misalignments as the classical Doppler shift varies only quadratically around 0 and π. And finally, as two frequencies are measured, both the time dilation factor as well as the atoms’ velocity can be extracted to an accuracy given by the frequency uncertainty. When observing perpendicularly, the velocity has to be determined separately to provide a test of the time dilation relation. In the next section the principle of the Ives-Stilwell experiment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it