The Arts of the Prima Donna in the Long Nineteenth Century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The female singers who graced the nineteenth-century operatic stage were among the most celebrated women of their era, but they were also among the most transgressive. This book explores the means by which this preeminence was negotiated, traversing the musical, the dramatic, and the visual, while addressing more recognizably modern concerns, such as career management, literary representation, and image manipulation. A key theme is the emergence of the diva archetype over the course of the century—a new ideological discourse through which the extremes of operatic female vocality were reinterpreted. Chapters approach the prima donna from the perspectives of cultural history, musicology, gender/sexuality studies, theater and literature studies, and critical theory. \n \nContributors: \nGurminder Kaur Bhogal is Assistant Professor of Music at Wellesley College.; Joy H. Calico is Associate Professor of Musicology at the Blair School of Music, Vanderbilt University, where she teaches courses on music since 1800 and on opera.; Terry Castle teaches at Stanford University, where she is the Walter A. Haas Professor in the Humanities.; Susan C. Cook is Professor of Music and the Associate Dean for Arts and Humanities in the Graduate School at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.; Rachel Cowgill is Professor in the School of Music at Cardiff University.; James Currie is Assistant Professor of Music History in the Department of Music at the University of Buffalo (State University of New York).; James Q. Davies is an Assistant Professor of Music at University of California, Berkeley.; Tracy C. Davis, Barber Professor of the Performing Arts at Northwestern University.; Sophie Fuller is a freelance musicologist.; Helen Greenwald has taught at the New England Conservatory since 1991 and was Visiting Professor of Music at the University of Chicago, winter-spring 2008.; Francesco Izzo is Lecturer in Music at the University of Southampton, and has also taught at New York University, East Carolina University, and the University of Chicago.; Grace Kehler is an Associate Professor of English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario (Canada).; Roberta Montemorra Marvin is a Research Fellow at the Obermann Center for Advanced Studies at The University of Iowa, where she is also Director of the Institute for Italian Opera Studies and Associate Professor.; Hilary Poriss is Associate Professor of Music attern Northeastern University.; Julian Rushton retired from the West Riding Chair of Music at the University of Leeds in 2002.; Susan Rutherford is Senior Lecturer in Performance Studies at the Martin Harris Centre for Music and Drama, University of Manchester.; Mary Simonson teaches at Colgate University in Hamilton, New York, and completed her doctorate at the University of Virginia in 2007.; Alexandra Wilson is Senior Lecturer in Musicology at Oxford Brookes University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".