The use of ‘rollie’ in New Zealand: Preference for loose tobacco among an ethnically diverse low socio-economic urban population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim To examine the prevalence of and reasons for smoking roll-your-own (RYO) cigarettes in a population of South Auckland adults. Method Cross-sectional survey of the parents of 2,973 children at four South Auckland Intermediate Schools in 2007–2009. Result Just over a quarter (813; 27%) of parents were smokers. Most (82%) were Maori or Pacific peoples (47% and 34% respectively) of whom 47% smoked only factory-made (FM) and 38% smoked only RYO cigarettes. Exclusive RYO smoking was more common among European (53%) than Maori (40%), Pacific (38%) and Asian ethnic groups (23%). The most common reasons for preferring RYO over FM cigarettes were lower cost (50%), lasting longer (42%), and taste (8%). A few chose RYO because they perceived them to be less harmful (5%). Conclusion Reducing the cost benefit of RYO should lessen the potential use of RYOs as an alternative to quitting. Health education campaigns are needed to counter incorrect beliefs surrounding RYO. Such programmes should include awareness in schools, churches and Pacific communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".