Indonesia Economic Quarterly, March 2011 : 2008 Again?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Indonesia economic quarterly reports \n on and synthesizes the past three months' key \n developments in Indonesia's economy. It places them in \n a longer-term and global context, and assesses the \n implications of these developments and other changes in \n policy for the outlook for Indonesia's economic and \n social welfare. Its coverage ranges from the macro economy \n to financial markets to indicators of human welfare and \n development. It is intended for a wide audience, including \n policy makers, business leaders, financial market \n participants, and the community of analysts and \n professionals engaged in Indonesia's evolving economy. \n Economic developments over the past quarter bear some strong \n similarities with the situation seen in the first half of \n 2008. Most notably, rises in domestic and international \n commodity prices have again brought with them a variety of \n risks, both positive and negative, at the macroeconomic and \n household level. While oil prices increased sharply with \n political developments in the Middle East and North Africa, \n strong price rises have been seen across global commodities. \n Non-energy commodities, including food, were up 30 percent \n in the six months to February 2011, similar to the increases \n seen in the first half of 2008. The experiences of other \n countries through the 2008 food price crisis suggest a range \n of potential policies which can provide well-targeted \n protection for vulnerable households and maintain and create \n incentives for producers to help limit future price volatility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it